2 Peter 1

2 Peter 1:1 · Brandon Crowe

And so what you have in 2 Peter 2, oh, sorry, 2 Peter 1, verse 1, is probably the Grandel Sharp rule at play. And the Grandel Sharp rule says where you have the article before a singular personal noun, and you have another singular personal noun that doesn’t have the article, and it’s joined with an

2 Peter 1:1 · Dan Ragusa

Yeah. So as I mentioned just before, Lightheart is arguing from the letter as a whole. And so he argues for a caistic structure of 2 Peter as a whole. And part of that is then to see 2 Peter 1 verses 1 through 11 and then 2 Peter 3

2 Peter 1:4 · Camden Bucey

But there are several quotes out of the Institutes and also out of his commentaries in which Calvin starts to speak about participation in God. And even at some points, he starts to say things that might make us a little uneasy, and we’ll have to qualify. Mosser writes, echoing 2 Peter 1.4, Calvin s

2 Peter 1:4 · Jeff Waddington

Your handling of 2 Peter 1.4, right, is very helpful.

2 Peter 1:4 · Camden Bucey

Speaking of the return of our Lord, there will be a glorious resurrection. Peter says in 2 Peter 1.4 that we become partakers of the divine nature. Now, I believe that has to do with sanctification and escaping the corruption that is in the world because of sin, because that’s the next phrase in tha

2 Peter 1:4 · Camden Bucey

We become partakers of the divine nature, if we want to read 2 Peter 1.4 in that way. Right. But the difference here, because the question here regards the creator-creature distinction, and there’s always a proportionality. We never become God himself, because he subsists. He subsists. The three per

2 Peter 1:19–21 · Lane G. Tipton

Now this, Camden, I think our listeners have got to appreciate this. If you think of 2 Timothy 3.16 and 2 Peter 1.19-21, the thing that we note is that all of the prophetic scriptures, whether it’s Old or New Testament, but predominantly Old comes into view here.

2 Peter 1:19–20 · Lane G. Tipton

But both Warfield and Voss will say, in light of 2 Timothy 3.16, in light of 2 Peter 1.19-20, that the scriptures, while being truly human, are also superhuman. There’s something beyond the human that provides the underlying essential character of the Bible as the words of God,

2 Peter 1:20 · Lane G. Tipton

We want to affirm that John the Baptist is a prophet. And as 1 Peter 1.11 says, the Spirit of Christ in the prophets testified to the coming of Christ. And 2 Peter 1.20 and 21 says, they wrote as moved along, carried along by the Holy Spirit. So we don’t want to deny that at all. Yet, 1 Peter 1.10 a

2 Peter 1:21 · Camden Bucey

Are there differences, you know, when you think of a verse like 2 Peter 1.21, For no prophecy was ever produced by the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit. So carried along there is pharomenoid, a participle. Are people interacting with this on either si