Romans 2

Romans 1:16–3:26 · Camden Bucey

But that’s evident here when we start to look at the arguments and the materials therein. So the official title here, at least the published edition, I assume the dissertation was somewhat related. But the title here, Uncovering the Theme of Revelation in Romans 1.16-3.26, Discovering a New Approach

Romans 1:16–3:26 · Camden Bucey

So, Marcus, when you’re approaching this, you’re focusing specifically on Romans 1.16-3.26, but what really is the burden of your study as you look at that particular section of Romans? What are you attempting to do in this new work?

Romans 1–3

: Discovering a New Approach to Paul s Argument (Mohr Siebeck), Dr. Mininger argues for approaching Romans 1–3 through a new interpretive paradigm that features revelation over reading Paul s words primarily through a soteriological or sociological framework. Listen to the Series

Romans 1–3

: Discovering a New Approach to Paul s Argument (Mohr Siebeck), Dr. Mininger argues for approaching Romans 1–3 through a new interpretive paradigm that features revelation over reading Paul s words primarily through a soteriological or sociological framework. In this fourth episo

Romans 2:4 · Marcus Mininger

and shows, you know, see, God did this to the Egyptians, but then he treated the Israelites differently. And the conclusion that it draws Wisdom of Solomon 16, 1 and 2 is very similar. You can see a lot of resonance with what Paul talks about in Romans 2.4. This interest in God’s kindness, his forbe

Romans 2:4 · Marcus Mininger

those people, meaning Israel’s enemies, were deservedly punished. So, they got what they deserved. But instead of this punishment, you showed kindness to your people. It’s not the same term. It’s a very similar term to what you see in Romans 2.4. So, for Wisdom, there’s two kinds of people in the wo

Romans 2:4 · Marcus Mininger

but you, our God, are kind and true and patient. Notice those same words, the same basic words that come up in Romans 2.4. Kind and true and patient, ruling all things in mercy, for even if we sin, we are yours. Right? So, the Egyptians, yeah, they’re going to get what they deserve, but there’s just

Romans 2:5 · Marcus Mininger

and were described throughout the whole of the rest of Romans 1, these are two themes that Paul quickly returns to in Romans 2, particularly in, we see it in Romans 2.5. He says, but by your hard and impenitent heart, you are storing up wrath for yourself on the day of wrath and revelation of the ri

Romans 1:16–3:26 · Camden Bucey

and review parts one, two, and three. You can find information also about this book at more seebeck’s website, mohr.de. Information on that is available in the episode description. But we have been talking about the book by Marcus Mininger, Uncovering the Theme of Revelation in Romans 1.16-3.26, Dis

Romans 1–3

: Discovering a New Approach to Paul s Argument (Mohr Siebeck), Dr. Mininger argues for approaching Romans 1–3 through a new interpretive paradigm that features revelation over reading Paul s words primarily through a soteriological or sociological framework. In this third episod

Romans 2:5 · Marcus Mininger

And then, what happened is, I just, I started, then I looked at Romans 2.16 where Paul talks about the secret things or the hidden things will be judged. And Romans 2.5 where the wrath of God will be, the righteous judgment of God, rather, will be revealed. And Romans 2.19 and 20 where God’s invisib

Romans 2:16 · Marcus Mininger

And then, what happened is, I just, I started, then I looked at Romans 2.16 where Paul talks about the secret things or the hidden things will be judged. And Romans 2.5 where the wrath of God will be, the righteous judgment of God, rather, will be revealed. And Romans 2.19 and 20 where God’s invisib

Romans 2:19 · Marcus Mininger

And then, what happened is, I just, I started, then I looked at Romans 2.16 where Paul talks about the secret things or the hidden things will be judged. And Romans 2.5 where the wrath of God will be, the righteous judgment of God, rather, will be revealed. And Romans 2.19 and 20 where God’s invisib

Romans 1–3

Romans 2:13–16 · Bill Dennison

and the Romans 2.13-16 passage. And in that way, he uses his own means to bring the consciousness of his deity and the consciousness of moral truth into the creation, even in some ways into civil governments,

Romans 2:13 · Lane Keister

But other federal vision proponents like Douglas Wilson, for instance, are not so keen on N.T. Wright. But I do think that there are points of similarity with regard to future justification and the formulations that N.T. Wright has about Romans 2.13, among other passages. So I think there are some p

Romans 2:13 · Guy Prentiss Waters

Well, I think just to pick up on something we were discussing in the first hour, his discussion of Romans, you know, it effectively launches with Romans 2, which, of course, begins with Paul’s great picture of the Judgment Day. And I found that very interesting. and he moves into Romans 2.13, not th

Romans 2:13 · Nick Batzig

You know, Guy, it’s interesting. Romans 2.13 is a passage that comes up time and time again, and Wright alludes to it in a small section, in his section on Romans, but it’s so massive. He actually says that Romans 2.13 is the first mention of justification in this letter, and thereby using that term

Romans 2:13 · Nick Batzig

You know, Guy, it’s interesting. Romans 2.13 is a passage that comes up time and time again, and Wright alludes to it in a small section, in his section on Romans, but it’s so massive. He actually says that Romans 2.13 is the first mention of justification in this letter, and thereby using that term

Romans 2:13 · Nick Batzig

anybody read Calvin on Romans 2, and just with all that Wright has said, nobody really deals with this, and he’s often made those kind of statements as if this is the verse for him, and I just want to read what Calvin says. Calvin says about Romans 2.13 that if righteousness be sought from the law,

Romans 2:15 · Lane G. Tipton

And third, that internal revelation is the sense of deity that’s inalienably and ineradicably engraven upon him. And Van Til is rooting this. This will be key. In Romans 1.20, the census divinitatis, the knowledge of God made evident in them. And Romans 2.15, the law of God, the works of God’s law,

Romans 1:16–3:26

mature in Christ (Col. 1:28). Episodes 524 — Marcus Mininger, Uncovering the Theme of Revelation in Romans 1:16–3:26 533 — Michael Kruger, How the Second Century Shaped the Future of the Church 540 — The Nature of Apostasy in Hebrews 6 542 — Bill Dennison, Karl Marx 551 — The Imp

Romans 2:16 · Robert Tarullo

The lamb will be the judge on the last day. God judges the secrets of men by Jesus Christ, says Paul, Romans 2.16. Jesus himself taught this. Speak of the son of man, his favorite self-designation for himself. He said, the father has given him authority to execute judgment, John 5.27. Why is this si

Romans 2:17 · Nick Batzig

And then he says, yes, I agree, absolutely. That means taking Romans 3.21 to 4.25 seriously as a whole argument and discovering the meaning of its key terms. It means taking Romans 9.30 to 10.13 seriously as a whole argument. And then he says it means taking Romans 2.17 to 3.8 seriously. Now, as I r

Romans 2:17 · Nick Batzig

But then it hit me. He has set the parameters of the context. So here at this last one, for instance, he says that means taking Romans 2.17 to 3.8. Well, why begin at 2.17 and why end at 3.8? Why not start at 2.1 with the shift to the focus on the Jews and move to 3.26? It’s very subtle, and most pe